MANILA – In recent news, a senator from the Philippines has proposed a move to amend or revise the Constitution. This proposal has sparked discussions and debates, with some supporting the idea and others expressing concerns.
The question arises, why is there a need for charter change? The answer to this question is not straightforward, and there are several factors to consider.
Firstly, the current Constitution was drafted in 1987, more than three decades ago. Since then, the country has undergone significant changes, including social, political, and economic transformations. Therefore, some argue that the Constitution no longer reflects the current realities and needs of the country.
Secondly, there have been several attempts to amend the Constitution in the past, but none of them have succeeded. These attempts were usually met with strong opposition from various groups, including politicians, civil society organizations, and the general public. However, the latest proposal seems to have gained some traction, and it remains to be seen how it will be received.
Thirdly, there are specific provisions in the Constitution that some argue are outdated or need to be revised. For example, the economic provisions that restrict foreign ownership of businesses and land have been criticized for limiting foreign investment in the country. Some argue that relaxing these provisions could lead to more foreign investment, which could spur economic growth.
However, there are also concerns that charter change could lead to more significant problems, such as political instability and erosion of democratic principles. Some fear that the proposed changes could consolidate power in the hands of a few, limit press freedom and human rights, and undermine the checks and balances in the government.
In conclusion, the question of whether there is a need for charter change is complex and multifaceted. While some argue that the current Constitution no longer reflects the current realities of the country, others express concerns that charter change could lead to more significant problems. Ultimately, any changes to the Constitution should be carefully considered, debated, and made with the best interests of the country in mind.
